Peritus was mentioned in the article, “This ETF is drilling for high yield,” by MarketWatch, October 30, 2014.
Peritus’ Ron Heller will be a guest on CNBC’s “Closing Bell” on Monday, November 3rd at 3:45pm ET, where he’ll discuss the opportunities he is seeing in the bond market.
It was hard to ignore the call in the fixed income space for “short duration” investing over the last couple years. Duration is a measure of interest rate sensitivity (the percentage change in the price of a bond for a 100 basis point move in rates), so the lower the duration the theoretically less sensitive those bonds are to interest rate movements. Lower duration bonds would not eliminate the interest rate impact, just lessen it. We see this as a good strategy broadly speaking if you are talking the high yield asset class versus the investment grade asset class, with the high yield market naturally having a much lower duration due to its higher starting yields and generally shorter maturities. However, we believe this strategy is lacking when it is used to parse out the high yield space itself, investing in only the lower duration names within the high yield category, irrespective of other considerations.
This gets back to the concept of yield. In a box, this sounds like a good strategy, but you need to factor in the starting yield on the portfolio to mathematically assess if practically speaking this is the right strategy. If you were to invest according to a “short duration” strategy in the high yield debt market, let’s hypothetically say you could achieve a portfolio with a duration of 2.0 years, so a 100 bps change in rates over 6mos would mean that the price of your portfolio would theoretically decline by 2.0%. If your starting current yield on the portfolio was 6.5%, meaning you theoretically generate 3.25% of income over that 6mos, then you are looking at a theoretical net gain of 1.25% (3.25% – 2.0%) over the period of rising rates. However, if you can build a portfolio in the high yield bond and loan market investing according to both maximizing yield and considering duration, let’s say you can build a portfolio with a duration of 2.5 years and a current yield of around 9%. In this case, your theoretical sensitivity to a 100bps movement over 6mos would be a price change of 2.5%, but you would be theoretically generating 4.5% of income over the 6mos, so your net theoretical gain would be 2.0%. If that 100bps interest rate movement is over a year instead of 6 months, that yield benefit gets even larger, putting you at a theoretical net gain of 4.5% for the hypothetical short duration portfolio versus a theoretical gain of 6.5% for the higher yielding portfolio.1
But you also most consider what if rates don’t rise, then what? It seemed the short duration investing was the big trend heading into 2013 as virtually everyone thought rates were going to rise, and the trend hasn’t abated as the year has progressed. However, that rate increase hasn’t played out, as rates on the 10-year Treasury ended 2013 at 3.04%, and now sit around 2.2% today. As noted above, duration is a measure of price change based on a change in interest rates, and that price move works in both directions: a theoretical price decline if rates rise as we have profiled above, but also a theoretical price increase if rates decline. So in an environment such as we have seen so far this year, with rates declining, then the higher yielding portfolio would not only benefit from the higher starting yield but a theoretical positive price movement per the duration calculation.1
So we see this as compelling evidence that investing purely according to a short duration strategy and not factoring in yield is not necessarily the wisest way to approach this market and the seemingly ever present interest rate concerns. At the end of the day, yield matters. A higher yield can go a long way in making up for relatively small differences in duration. Furthermore, even if rates do rise, it very well can take longer than many expect (many were certainly wrong on how 2013 would play out!), making the argument for the higher yielding portfolio versus the purely short duration portfolio even stronger.
For more on the high yield market’s historical performance during periods of rising rates and the current strategies in place, and their deficiencies, to address the rising rate environment, see our piece “Strategies for Investing in a Rising Rate Environment.”
1 The duration and price movement relationships are approximates and calculations are provided for illustration only. These calculations assume that credit spreads remain constant and do not factor in any fees or expenses or changes in price movements for other reasons, including security fundamentals, etc. Actual results may be materially different.
Peritus was mentioned in the article “One Country EM Bond ETF Investors Need to Watch” by Todd Shriber of ETF Trends, October 21, 2014.
We have written in the past about some of the concerns we had the with “hedged high yield” strategy (see our blog), whereby investors go long high yield bonds and short Treasuries (or Treasury futures). As we noted in our prior writings:
We see another big problem with a combined portfolio of being long high yield bonds and short Treasuries: during times of systemic market disruptions we see a “flight to quality” trade, where investors abandon perceived “risky” assets such as high yield bonds and pile into “risk free” Treasuries. So in a situation like this, you would not only be hit on a decline in your high yield bonds as investors sell them, but you would be hit on your short Treasury position as investor flock to these assets and bid up the price of Treasuries. So at face value the “hedge” sounds appealing, but it very well may be far from a hedge depending on the market environment.
History has told us this was the case and we are in the midst of seeing it play out. The recent market re-pricing in both equities and fixed income, has sent the high yield bond market down. And in the midst of this we have seen yields in Treasury bonds collapse, with the yield on the 10-year Treasury ending 2013 over 3% and now touching below 2% this morning. So in this case, you are getting a double hit. Investors beware…
Here are some of the reasons we believe that the high yield bond market looks attractive at current levels:
- MODERATE RISK: With default being the primary risk for high yield bonds and bank loan investing, we see no systemic default spike on the horizon, as maturities have been largely pushed out to 2017 and beyond1, companies have maintained reasonable discipline through this cycle, and capital markets remain functional, with CLO issuance setting records and high yield new issues continuing to print.
- ATTRACTIVE SPREADS: With much of the secondary high yield market having been indiscriminately sold, we are now back to spread levels of 527bps on the index.3 This compares to historical median spread levels of 519bps over the last nearly 30 years.4 So we are at median spread levels, but with a well below average default outlook. While a portion of the index continues to trade at tight spreads to call prices, we are seeing plenty of bonds at 750 basis points, or more, over the 5-year Treasury, which is among the best we’ve seen when combined with overall risk outlook.
- U.S. FOCUS: Most high yield companies, and specifically our general area of focus in the mid-sized issuers, are largely domestically focused, which can serve to avoid some of the headwinds of a stronger U.S. dollar impacting exports and the conversion of foreign profits and weakening economic activity in other areas of the world, both of which we expect to be a drag on broad multinational companies and thus the major stock market averages.
- ALPHA POTENTIAL: The high yield and floating rate loan markets have dramatically expanded, now at $3 trillion, allowing active investors to work to create value through a variety of mechanisms, just like in a stock investing, including:
- Industry exposure—Strategically allocating to an industry we see as undervalued.
- Capital structure positioning—Secured or subordinate securities, taking advantage of what we see as the best risk/return potential within a company’s capital structure.
- Yield-to-Call—“Cushion” bonds for which we expect a near-term call.
- Avoiding negative convexity—Avoiding securities at large premiums over call prices.
- VOLATILITY: Volatility can create a great entry point, as often the average retail investor sells on emotion rather than fundamentals, thus creating potential opportunities for active managers to put on positions at a discount in individual securities within their portfolios, but also potential opportunities for those investing in these funds.
- APPEALING VALUE: The high yield market provides what we see as attractive, tangible income to investors. As we had mentioned, we are seeing plenty of opportunities at 750bps above the 5-year Treasury, which is now sub 1.5%, so if you theoretically could build a portfolio with a yield of 9%, and a default rate of 2%, with a recovery rate of 40% (the historical average)5, we are looking at a theoretical loss rate of 1.2% and a risk-adjusted yield of 7.8%.6 This compares to 1.5% on the 5-Year Treasury, 2.2% on the 10-Year Treasury, 2.89% on investment grade, and 1.99% on the municipal bonds.7 On a relative value, we believe the high yield market offers very compelling value.
1 Acciavatti, Peter D., Tony Linares, Nelson Jantzen, CFA, Rahul Sharma, and Chuanxin Li. “Credit Strategy Weekly Update.” J.P. Morgan, North American High Yield and Leveraged Loan Research. October 3, 2014, p. 9.
2 Acciavatti, Peter D., Tony Linares, Nelson Jantzen, CFA, Rahul Sharma, and Chuanxin Li. “Credit Strategy Weekly Update.” J.P. Morgan, North American High Yield and Leveraged Loan Research. October 3, 2014, p. 11. As noted, the current default rate excludes the impact of TXU.
3 Index referenced is the Credit Suisse High Yield Index. The Credit Suisse High Yield Index is designed to mirror the investible universe of the $US-denominated high yield debt market. Data sourced from Credit Suisse, as of 10/14/14.
4 Historical spread data covers the period from 1/31/1986 to 9/30/2014.
5 The last 37 years of data have shown a recovery rate of 42.85%. Blau, Jonathan, James Esposito, and Daniyal Khan. “2014 Leveraged Finance Outlook and 2013 Annual Review,” Credit Suisse Global Leveraged Finance. February 6, 2014, p. 217
6 HYPOTHETICAL ONLY. These calculations assume that credit spreads remain constant and do not factor in any fees or expenses or changes in price movements for other reasons, including security fundamentals, etc. Actual results may be materially different. Default rates based on projected trends but actual results may be materially different.
7 U.S. 5 and 10 Year Treasury Note is sourced from the U.S. Department of Treasury, Daily Treasury Curve Rates. Investment Grade yield to worst based on the Barclays Corporate Investment Grade Index, which consists of publicly issued U.S. corporate and specified foreign debentures and secured notes that meet the specified maturity, liquidity, and the quality requirements (source Barclays Capital). Municipal yield to worst based on the Barclays Municipal Bond Index, which covers the long-term, tax-exempt bond market (source Barclays Capital). All data as of 10/14/14.
Peritus’ Tim Gramatovich will be speaking at the panel “High Yield: When Does Crowded become Over-Crowded” at the Inside Fixed Income Conference, being held at The Island Hotel in Newport Beach, California on October 22nd.
Tim Gramatovich, Chief Investment Officer at Peritus, will be a guest on the PBS “Nightly Business Report,” with Tyler Mathisen and Susie Gharib (available on-line and local PBS stations), for Thursday, October 2, 2014 to discuss the recent movements and opportunities in the energy and commodity markets.
Markets are funny beasts. Efficient? Perhaps. Manic? Always. What has been going on since everyone came back from the beach is quite simple: risk off. There has been a quiet but vicious downdraft in both credit and small cap equities which has really been hidden by those following the Dow and the S&P 500. As high yield bond spreads have widened dramatically over the last month to levels not seen in over a year, we believe this provides an attractive entry point into high yield corporate debt. To see our full commentary on current market conditions and how we are investing accordingly, click here.
It has been a long quiet period in credit but volatility has returned with a vengeance. I have had an opportunity to discuss this with a number of our institutional clients in recent days, but there are a few factors that are exacerbating the recent price declines in the high yield bond market. To cut to the chase, most importantly for investors, we see this as representing a fantastic opportunity to buy this market aggressively on the cheap and capture a liquidity premium created by the law of unintended consequences. With over thirty years of experience in this market, I do not see it as a value trap or a fool’s errand. Nobody is making the case that a huge default cycle is about to begin in either the high yield or loan market, so from our perspective the fundamental fears are fairly non-existent. It does not mean that we won’t see defaults. We certainly will, as evidenced by the biggest failure of all Texas Utilities (aka Energy Future Holdings). But these remain a very, very small percentage of the overall high yield market which is now approaching $1.7 trillion. We have the Fed (Yellen and Fisher) barking at the moon, talking about risk in the high yield market. My best guess here is that they are trying to warn the market of impending rate increases. They surely cannot be talking about fundamentals of corporate high yield debt issuers, which they would have no idea about. My advice is for them is to talk with the investment grade corporate and mortgage community which have much more significant exposure to higher rates. Our asset class is among the lowest duration among the major fixed income sub-groups.1 We have written chapter and verse on why we see rates going nowhere so let’s leave that alone for now.
Let’s turn our attention back to the law of unintended consequences. Post the 2008 carnage, governments across the globe have been working overtime to “reduce” systemic risk in the financial system. What they have done is created a series of regulatory mechanisms (Basel III, Dodd-Frank and Volcker) that has penalized any type of risk taking. This includes market making activities for all the major banks/broker dealers. So what we have is very thin secondary markets. What has happened recently is that significant selling has been met with low-ball bids or none at all. The bonds in many cases have to experience “price discovery,” whereby investors such as Peritus and others become the market. Said another way, there are brokers but no dealers.
This is not really a surprise to anyone, but this is one of the first stress tests in bondland since the new regulations have taken hold. While there is short term pain involved, we see the potential ability to capture sizable liquidity premiums and buy discounted bonds as incredibly attractive and very timely. Attractive because we don’t believe that anything fundamentally has changed. With the recent and substantial widening of spreads, we believe it is simply a matter of time before institutional investors re-allocate monies to our asset class and the liquidity premium and overall spreads tightens back to much lower levels.